Home Blog Page 111

Latest Research Solves Freeway Ramp Merging problem of Autonomous Vehicles

Ramp merging autonomous vehicles reinforcement learning, Carnegie Mellon

In the past two decades, there has been a lot of interest in autonomous driving because to its numerous advantages, like relieving drivers from exhausting driving and reducing traffic congestion, among others. As a result, researchers have paid close attention to autonomous vehicles due to their potential to increase the efficiency and safety of transportation networks through control algorithms while cutting down on fuel usage. 

Despite encouraging advancement, ramp merging has been a major challenge that threatens to cause frequent traffic jams on the road, higher fuel consumption and emissions, safety concerns, and rear-end and side collisions. This is due to the decision-making process of merging cars, which causes them to first slow down or even stop on the ramp before merging into the main lane at an appropriate moment through control without interfering with the moving vehicles on the main lane. Since the cut-in movements of ramp vehicles can frequently disrupt the mainline traffic flow and result in numerous issues, ramp merging is crucial for freeway traffic operation.

At present, with their real-time communication and precise motion control abilities, autonomous vehicles can improve ramp merging activities through enhanced coordination techniques. Using specialized short-range radio communications and cellular networks, the communication technologies enable detailed and rapid information transmission among road users, traffic infrastructures, and control centers. As a result, vehicular moves can be arranged through real-time interactions among traffic participants. Furthermore, because they are less prone to delays and mistakes in the processes of identification, decision-making, and performance, autonomous driving systems in cars can execute the intended actions in a steady and timely way.

Read More: University of California, Berkeley designs self-driving robot based on Reinforcement Learning

To enhance tactical decision-making in autonomous vehicles, a number of impediments still need to be addressed, and as computational resources advance, there will undoubtedly be a number of exciting new chances to solve challenging issues. In an effort to boost efficiency, researchers from Carnegie Mellon University have created a reinforcement learning (RL)-based framework that could aid in the performance of autonomous vehicles in ramp merging settings. Their framework, outlined in a pre-published paper on arXiv, can contribute to strengthening the safety of autonomous vehicles at these crucial decision-making periods while lowering the likelihood of accidents.

Reinforcement learning is one of the most important machine learning methods to achieve Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). RL systems are frequently trained in gaming environments, which serve as testbeds for teaching agents new tasks using visual signals and the popular “carrot and stick” approach. 

In a reinforcement learning approach, artificial intelligence (AI) agents are put into simulated settings and given two options that are determined by predetermined policy. The agent makes a decision and is “punished” or “rewarded” for it; in other words, positive actions are encouraged, and negative ones are discouraged. Whether its decision has a favorable or detrimental consequence, the AI modifies its policy accordingly and repeats the process with fresh choices made that are time influenced by the modified policy. The AI agents keep going through this process until they find the best solution.

Read More: Understanding risk of Membership Inference Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Learning Models

Given the potential outcomes of the infinite complexity of complicated real-world circumstances and the significant risks involved, RL may require fundamental technological advancements to enable complete ‘autonomous’ driving. In recent times, reinforcement learning has been extensively investigated for lane-changing decision-making in AVs, with positive results. However, it was eventually discovered that most of these studies had compromised either the safety or the efficiency of the algorithm.

According to Soumith Udatha, one of the researchers who created the model, Prof. John Dolan’s department at CMU has been working on numerous autonomous driving applications for quite some time. Udatha says that due to the challenges posed by fast-moving cars, drivers with different driving styles, and inherent uncertainties, the application on which his team concentrated in this work is freeway merging.

The central goal of Udatha and his team’s study is to increase the safety of autonomous vehicles. In their paper, they sought to develop a framework particularly designed to capture ramp merging situations and plan a vehicle’s actions based on its analysis of any uncertainties and potential dangers.

Though, as mentioned above: reinforcement learning models interact with the environment and gather information to maximize their rewards, Udatha explained that this data exploration meets with several complications when used in practical contexts. This is partially due to the fact that not all of the states the agent encounters are safe. In order to assure safety at a given distance, the team limited its RL policy using control barrier functions (CBFs). As a result, they disregard unsafe states and improve a system’s capacity to learn how to travel according to environmental constraints.

CBFs are a group of relatively recent computational techniques created to improve the reliable control of autonomous systems, by ensuring a suitably-defined barrier function remains bounded for all time. They can be leveraged directly for a variety of optimization issues, particularly ramp-merging. Although they look good on paper, the optimizations they carry out do not take into consideration the information a system gathers as it is exploring an area. Reinforcement learning methods, as per Udatha, can eliminate this discrepancy.

The research team discovered that their algorithm could be applied to RL settings that are both online (while interacting with the environment) and offline (learning from a fixed dataset or logged data). However, offline reinforcement learning has currently become a core approach for using RL methods in practical settings. This is because it allows for the empirical evaluation of RL algorithms based on how well they can use a predefined dataset of interactions and produce real-world effects. 

Read More: Introducing Autocast: Dataset to Enable Forecasting of Real-World Events via Neural Networks

The team used a dataset extracted from the NGSIM Database, which includes high-quality traffic data at four locations: two freeway segments (I-80 and US-101) and two arterial segments (Lankershim Boulevard and Peachtree Street), between 2005 and 2006. The datasets collected and created for each location comprise the vehicle trajectory data (primary data), various location-specific primary and support data (e.g., ortho-rectified pictures of the research area, Computer-Aided Design (CAD) drawings of the study area, signal timings, weather data, detector data), raw video files, and processed video files.

Because the team now has massive volumes of data for offline RL, training on offline datasets may eventually result in superior models. The researchers also found — using their metrics — that adding probabilistic CBFs as limitations improves safety by partially accounting for driver uncertainty.

Using the online CARLA simulator created by a group of researchers at Intel Labs and the Computer Vision Center in Barcelona, Udatha and his colleagues put their framework through a number of tests. Their approach produced outstanding results in these simulations, emphasizing its great implications for boosting the safety of autonomous cars during ramp merging.

The research team now intends to continue the study by training their model to merge an autonomous car with many other vehicles in a situation with unknown drivers. Additionally, they discovered that there is presently no benchmark that can be used to evaluate different ramp-merging strategies, therefore Udatha’s team is working on creating one for NGSIM.

Advertisement

IIT Madras Wins the Silver Prize in the ‘Best Online Program’ from Wharton-QS Reimagine Education Awards

IIT Madras’s Bachelor of Science courses (BS) in data science and applications won the silver prize in the ‘Best Online Program’ category at the Wharton-QS Reimagine Education Awards. At the same time, NPTEL (National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning), a joint initiative of IITs and IISC, won the gold prize in the ‘Lifelong Learning Category’ at the Wharton-QS Reimagine Education Awards.

The Wharton-QS Reimagine education award is called the ‘Oscars of Education.’ It recognizes and celebrates the outstanding achievements of educators, institutions, and organizations that drive innovation and excellence in education. The award ceremony was held on December 7th and 8th at the Wharton Campus, Philadelphia, USA.

Read more: AWS InCommunites invests $300,000 in Northern Virginia Sustainability Fund 

IIT Madras BS program has more than 15,000 students enrolled currently. The program is in a hybrid mode that has online delivery and in-person assessments. At the same time, NPTEL offers more than 4000 courses for certification currently. It has more than two crore enrollments and about 23 lakh examination registrations.

Professor V. Kamakoti, Director of IIT Madras, mentioned that the BS program and NPTEL are examples of how technology can deliver high-quality education to students from different locations. IITs are committed to innovating and finding new ways to enhance their students’ learning experience.

Advertisement

Meta agrees to pay $725 million to settle class-action lawsuit with Cambridge Analytica 

Meta agrees pay $725 million lawsuit Cambridge Analytica

Meta has agreed to pay $725 million for settling a class-action lawsuit that claims the company inappropriately shared users’ information with a data analytics firm used by the Trump campaign called Cambridge Analytica.

In 2018, it came to light that the information of up to 87 million people might have been inappropriately accessed by the third-party firm, which had filed for bankruptcy in 2018.  

According to the plaintiffs’ lawyers in a court filing, this is the most significant recovery ever in a data privacy class-action lawsuit and the highest amount Facebook has paid to settle a private class-action.

Read More: VLSI And Intel Agree To End Patent Dispute In Delaware 

Meta has not admitted wrongdoing and claims its users consented to the practices, thus suffering no actual damages. Meta spokesperson Dina El-Kassaby Luce said that the settlement was for the good of its community and shareholders. The company has since then revamped its approach to privacy, she added. 

According to the Plaintiffs’ lawyers, about 250 million to 280 million people might be eligible for payments for the class action settlement. The amount of individual payments depends on the number of people who come forward with claims that are valid.

Over the past several years, Facebook’s data leak to Cambridge Analytica has sparked global backlash and government investigations into the company’s privacy practices.

Advertisement

Bursting Tesla’s Full-Self Driving Software Hype: California Slams Brake with new laws

California bans Tesla Full self driving

According to a California Highway Patrol (CHP) traffic crash report, a Tesla driver claimed that their vehicle’s “Full Self-Driving (FSD)” software unexpectedly braked and caused an eight-car pileup in the Yerba Buena Tunnel last month. Nine people were treated for minor injuries, including one child who was hospitalized. The CHP analyzed tunnel footage and discovered that the Tesla performed an illegal lane change before suddenly slowing down from 55 mph to 20 mph, forcing vehicles behind it to collide with one another, according to the December 7th report received by CNN Business.

The above incident can be viewed as another incident caused by the automaker’s US$15,000 Full Self-Driving software package. But can we still afford to ignore questioning the facade of hype behind the technology that is being marketed to bring the next revolution in the autonomous vehicle industry? Is it possible that beyond the promise to advance the scope of self-driving vehicles, Tesla might have overstated the capabilities of its full-self driving software?

This year the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has been investigating multiple cases where Tesla’s full-self driving or advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) played an unfortunate role in inadvertently causing the accidents.

Tesla currently comes with a standard driving assistance feature dubbed Autopilot in all of its new vehicles. Additionally, it offers extra functions, viz., Smart Summon, Navigate on Autopilot, and Automatic Lane Changes, in a package that is commonly marketed as Full Self-Driving. Under its FSD Beta program, the company also permits select owners to access and test features — which have not yet been entirely bug-fixed — on public roads. The software is designed to keep up with traffic, navigate within the lane and adhere to traffic signals. It requires a careful human driver who is ready to take over complete control of the vehicle at any time. While some drivers have been thrilled by this software, many are concerned that a Tesla outfitted with FSD would misbehave at the worst possible time.

The “full self-driving” beta, which became available to everyone in North America since November, has proven to be worrisome for many Tesla customers who paid US$15,000 for the software upgrade, believing in Tesla CEO Musk Elon’s claims. This is because the program occasionally tries to strike curbs or travel on the wrong side of the road. While Tesla is continually improving the technology and addressing its flaws, beta testers’ experiences offer a glimpse into the incredibly risky and expensive gamble the company is placing on its so-called full self-driving technology.

Read More: Tesla cars to have Zoom video conferencing feature

The ‘full-self driving’ was initially conceptualized as a technology that can help vehicles maneuver through the roads without any human assistance. However, if Tesla requires human drivers to take over in case of any malfunction of its “FSD software,” the term has already lost its original meaning. In order to rekindle the hype around fully autonomous vehicles, major companies like Tesla, Waymo announced that ‘full-self driving’ would be gradually introduced, starting with testing the vehicles in geographically restricted areas. Though this year, we have witnessed many companies testing autonomous robo-taxis in streets of Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Los Angeles, it will take decades for them to expand to a level that even comes close to countrywide deployment at the current rate. Consequently, costs and the organizational learning curve have been substantially higher and longer than anticipated. The companies have discovered that the technological prerequisites to allow mass adoption of the technology are far more challenging than they had initially anticipated, despite investing billions of dollars in its development over the course of a decade.

In hindsight, Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” software is more akin to a “Level 2” advanced driver assistance system that requires constant active supervision by a driver, despite the advertising. There is concrete evidence to back this claim too! The DMV and Tesla were exchanging emails in 2019 and 2020 that were disclosed by Plainsite in response to a public records request revealing the company’s Full Self-Driving mode, also known as City Streets, was a Level 2 technology while Musk was making audacious claims about fully autonomous vehicles. This proves that Tesla’s technology is no more capable of autonomous driving than rival driver-assistance systems offered by companies under the Level 2 category.

If you account for the reality of the situation, why does Tesla continues to market itself as the developer of ‘full-self driving’ software for its vehicles? Is it blatant ignorance to steer the sales by capitalizing on the misinformed hype or an optimistic bet? While Tesla doesn’t claim the software to enable fully autonomous driving, does it set a dangerous precedent?

For now, we have a temporary yet effective solution to this dilemma: California lawmakers have recently passed a new law prohibiting Tesla from labeling its software ‘Full Self-Driving!’ The new law, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez of Long Beach and signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom this legislative session, prevents car dealers and manufacturers in California from “deceptively naming or marketing” a car as self-driving if it’s outfitted with only partial automation features which still necessitate human drivers to pay attention and handle driving. 

Gonzalez informed the Los Angeles Times that the state Department of Motor Vehicles already has regulations against the misleading advertising of self-driving vehicles. However, the DMV’s lack of enforcement pushed her and state legislators to introduce legislation to incorporate the standards into state law.

The new bill, Senate Bill 1398, is one of the hundreds of new state regulations that will go into effect in 2023. It explicitly targets Tesla’s promotion of software contained in some Tesla models that implies the car can fully drive itself. According to Gonzalez, the bill increases consumer safety by mandating dealers and manufacturers who sell new passenger vehicles equipped with a semiautonomous driving assistance feature to include a comprehensive description of the capabilities and limitations of those systems.

It is important to note that the new bill does not address the safety concerns surrounding the Full-self driving software. However, it is the most recent instance of politicians, regulators, and customers fighting back against what they claim to be false and misleading advertising. In response, Tesla fought against the law, claiming that it already makes Tesla owners aware of the limits of the Full Self-Driving software.

Read More: Laser Attacks: A looming threat to Autonomous Vehicles

As tensions mount, Tesla may have to come clean about their litany of bogus claims about rolling ‘Level 5 autonomous vehicles,’ made by Musk every year. The takeaway is simple: Tesla cars must be subject to the same testing regulations as other autonomous vehicles that are now on our roads if they are sufficiently automatic to be advertised as Full Self-Driving. If the cars are not sufficiently automated to be regulated as autonomous vehicles, Tesla should be barred from marketing the technology as Full Self-Driving. Therefore, the California government is right in asking companies like Tesla to refrain from misleading people under the pretense of offering fully autonomous technologies. 

Though, banning Tesla from advertising vehicles as self-driving if they still require driver supervision is a historic milestone, much needs to be done. Even if a car is capable of operating safely in all circumstances, drivers will still need to be on guard and prepared to take over if necessary.

Tesla has chosen to make its self-driving technology available to consumers, unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo and Cruise, who test their vehicles in carefully monitored pilot projects. To minimize the risk of regular drivers facing risks of accidents or software malfunction, NHTSA should come up with a preapproval system before installation. It should also come up with certifications, as DMV offers to run autonomous vehicles in California, before the four-wheelers hit the roads. These are important as the self-driving automobile currently lacks a real industry software and hardware standard.

While companies like Tesla are aiming for fully autonomous driving, it does not imply eliminating the scope of driver assistance. In addition to sending frequent information on crashes and instances to DMV, where the human driver had to take over to prevent a crash, Tesla cars must have a certified and trained test driver operating the vehicle. Further, NHTSA should come up with some regulations that allow it to take action whenever Tesla launches software updates or recalls software features, irrespective of mode – via the internet or directly to drivers. This can address the governance blindspot that arises when autonomous vehicle companies add new features or patch software flaws remotely, triggering concerns about liability, accountability, and safety.

Advertisement

Bengali.AI: AI Research Project in Bangla Langauge

bengali.ai

While Google’s AI translation service works remarkably for many languages, people find it lacking in understanding Bengali nuances and expressions. Following the same thought, a non-profit organization called Bengali.AI works on making Bangla typing and translation inclusive with the help of researchers and AI professionals. 

Bengali.AI recently started its largest project called Bangla Speech Recognition. The goal is to teach computers to understand Bangla. For this, they conducted a social media campaign called the “Bok Bok Campaign.” Bangla speakers from around the world contributed their voice data to this campaign to expand the Bengali.AI voice dataset.

The idea behind Bengali.AI saw the light in 2017 when a group of students from Bangladesh started the project with a vision to push AI research in Bangla translation. Founded by Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun and his peers, the platform became the destination for those who dream. 

Read More: Made In Bengaluru: A Kannada Film To Be Released In The Metaverse

While it was a novel idea, the Bengali.AI platform did not receive much recognition until late 2019, when the organization tied up with Google to launch several competitions on Bangla Graphmemes (segments of word formation). Bengali.AI could pull over 7.5m hours of research work with this collaboration.

With developments in Bengali.AI over the next few years, the platform now works like Grammarly (an American typing assistant) but for the Bengali language.

Advertisement

AWS InCommunites invests $300,000 in Northern Virginia Sustainability Fund 

AWS (Amazon Web Services) InCommunites invested $300,000 in Northern Virginia Sustainability Fund to support sustainability and environmental projects in Northern Virginia, especially in Loudoun, Fairfax, Culpeper, Prince William, and Fauquier counties recently.

The main objective of the AWS InCommunites is to fund local projects with sustainable and environmental impact to protect Northern Virginia’s environment while giving residents economic opportunities. The fund is granted up to $10,000 per project and is open to individuals, local organizations, NGOs, and schools. 

Read more: Fortuna: Amazon unveils a new library for developing uncertainty quantification of ML models

Projects must address topics like agriculture preservation, environmental justice, energy conservation, zero waste initiatives, sustainable technology, cultural preservation, environmental access, equity, and justice. The grant process is powered by ChangeX and needs a 30 days review process to evaluate the positive impact on the community. The project applications are open till February 13th, 2022.

Cornelia Robinson, global leader of AWS InCommunites, stated that they sincerely believe in using AWS resources to strengthen communities where employees can live and work. AWS is committed to making the cloud the cleanest and the most efficient way for customers to run their businesses who have a passion for sustainability and can make a positive impact on their local communities.

Advertisement

VLSI and Intel agree to end patent dispute in Delaware 

VLSI Intel agree end patent dispute Delaware

VLSI Technology LLC and Intel have agreed to put an end to a patent dispute in Delaware. According to a court filing, Intel previously claimed that VLSI had demanded more than $4 billion in damages.

VLSI is a patent holding company that has brought several infringement lawsuits against Intel. It has won over $3 billion in jury verdicts from two other cases. 

According to the filing, VLSI would dismiss the Delaware case with prejudice, i.e., it cannot be brought again. It also said VLSI has agreed not to sue Intel’s customers or suppliers over the five patents in discussion in the case. It highlighted that neither party was paying the other to end it. 

Read More: BBMP To Survey The State Of Bengaluru Roads Using AI

Intel acknowledged on Tuesday that VLSI had agreed to dismiss the Delaware case. However, it did not provide additional details. 

Intel asked US District Judge Colm Connolly to dismiss the case in an unsealed filing earlier this month, arguing VLSI’s complicated structure was allowing its investors to reap any benefits from this suit while hiding their identities from the court and the public.

Advertisement

Made in Bengaluru: a Kannada Film to be Released in the Metaverse

made in bengaluru film metaverse

Interality announced the release of Made in Bengaluru, a Kannada film released in the metaverse. Featuring Anant Nag, Saikumar, and Prakash Belawadi, the story follows three young entrepreneurs attempting to establish their very first startup.

Within the movie metaverse, viewers can connect with the actors, click pictures via a drone camera, and participate in a quiz based on the movie. The top performers would also receive award tickets to the movie premiere on December 29. 

It will be an immersive viewing experience for people who can enjoy traditional film watching while exploring the endless possibilities of virtual reality. 

Read More: ftNFT Opens a Real-World NFT Store in Dubai

The movie can be considered a part of Karnataka’s recent efforts to educate people about the metaverse, artificial intelligence, and related technologies. The state also launched the BLR metaport for Kempegowda International Airport T2 in the metaverse. 


Furthermore, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahangara Palike (BBMP) also announced its plans to use artificial intelligence for arterial and sub-arterial road surveillance.

Advertisement

BBMP to survey the state of Bengaluru roads using AI

BBMP to survey the state of Bengaluru roads using AI
Photo by Darshan Devaiah

The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has announced plans to employ artificial intelligence (AI)-based surveys to assess the status of the city’s 1,434 km of arterial and sub-arterial roads.

As reported by The Hindu, the civic body has already carried out a test project on the AI-based survey of roads last year for 15 kilometers. Based on this, the BBMP requested proposals for an agency to conduct the survey. 

According to BBMP Chief Commissioner Tushar Giri Nath, the BBMP will use AI to identify a number of issues, including the presence of appropriate signboards and kilometer indicators. Giri Nath stated that for this endeavor, footage of the roads would be taken using a vehicle equipped with an AI technology-based camera. The survey will be conducted at least four times every year. 

The AI-based survey will also determine the state of potholes, missing metal beam crash barriers, broken curbs, and the functionality of lamps and solar blinkers. It is speculated that the survey will help the AI system in improving the quality of the roads.

Read More: Bengaluru Airport’s Terminal 2 Is Now On Metaverse

According to authorities, the BBMP had already spent around 5 lakh surveying 15 kilometers as part of the pilot project. Giri Nath admits that investing 5 lakhs for 15 kilometers is quite expensive, therefore requested local agencies to volunteer so that the AI survey is implemented at a much lower cost.

Advertisement

HSBC files Trademarks for various digital currency and metaverse products

One of the most extensive banking giants, HSBC, has filed a trademark application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for various digital currency products and services related to the metaverse and NFTs (non-fungible tokens).

The trademark application was filed on 15th December, where the HSBC bank described various products and services, including sending, receiving, and storing digital currencies. Mike Kondoudis, a USPTO-licensed trademark attorney, tweeted on Friday that HSBC’s trademark application indicates its plan for digital products and services, including exchanging and transferring virtual currencies. The application even included several NFT services like downloadable digital files, which NFTs authenticate.

Read more: Fortuna: Amazon unveils a new library for developing uncertainty quantification of ML models

The trademark application also consists of several metaverse-related products and services like facilitating secure payments transactions through electronic means in the metaverse, providing banking services in the metaverse, and offering processing of virtual credit cards, debit cards, prepaid cards, and virtual payment cards transactions in the metaverse.

Besides HSBC, many major corporations and financial institutions have filed trademark applications to cover various digital currencies and metaverse products and services. In October, companies like Visa, Western Union, and Paypal filed crypto-related trademark applications.

Advertisement